Star wars
AS THE famous, the glamorous and the downright outrageous take their seats on March 24th for Hollywood's annual orgy of self-congratulation, there will be less backslapping than usual. By the test of Oscar nominations, the six big studios have had a disastrous year. Only one of the films they have made in the past year--Sony's “Jerry Maguire”--has a chance of winning anything serious. Otherwise, the studios have failed to match on quality even that stylishly vapid favourite, “The English Patient”. More and more blockbusters seem to be made partly as a showcase for special effects and a few big-name stars; and partly to provide raw material for theme-park rides, computer games and toys.
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Star wars”
More from Leaders
How to improve clinical trials
Involving more participants can lead to new medical insights
Houthi Inc: the pirates who weaponised globalisation
Their Red Sea protection racket is a disturbing glimpse into an anarchic world
Donald Trump will upend 80 years of American foreign policy
A superpower’s approach to the world is about to be turned on its head
Rising bond yields should spur governments to go for growth
The bond sell-off may partly reflect America’s productivity boom
Much of the damage from the LA fires could have been averted
The lesson of the tragedy is that better incentives will keep people safe
Health warnings about alcohol give only half the story
Enjoyment matters as well as risk