A draft deal clarifies what populist trade policy means in practice
A bilateral breakthrough for America and Mexico, with Canada on the sidelines: can NAFTA negotiators pull it off?
“IT’S a big day for trade, a big day for our country,” boasted President Donald Trump on August 27th. The cause of this jubilation was progress in renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a deal between America, Mexico and Canada. Enrique Peña Nieto, Mexico’s president, confirmed that Mr Trump had managed to secure a bilateral “understanding” with Mexico. According to the White House’s spin doctors, Mr Trump had kept his pledge to renegotiate NAFTA and had produced a “mutually beneficial win for North American farmers, ranchers, workers and businesses”.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Wheeler dealer”
Finance & economics September 1st 2018
- A draft deal clarifies what populist trade policy means in practice
- KPMG is caught up in scandals but its woes are not existential
- Rules on bank lending in poor neighbourhoods are being rethought
- Markets bash Argentina’s and Turkey’s currencies again
- Informal trade is ubiquitous in Africa, but too often ignored
- Central bankers grapple with the changing nature of competition
More from Finance & economics
Donald Trump fires his starting pistol on tariffs
But it may be a while before he unleashes a universal levy
China meets its official growth target. Not everyone is convinced
For one thing, 2024 saw the second-weakest rise in nominal GDP since the 1970s
Ethiopia gets a stockmarket. Now it just needs some firms to list
The country is no longer the most populous without a bourse
Are big cities overrated?
New economic research suggests so
Why catastrophe bonds are failing to cover disaster damage
The innovative form of insurance is reaching its limits
“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson
It is a finite, sequential, incomplete information game