Up the NAIRU without a paddle
In the 1970s, mainstream thinking on unemployment converted to a new conservative orthodoxy. Now, liberals are making those ideas their own
IN 1968 Milton Friedman and Edmund Phelps, in papers written independently, assaulted the prevailing consensus on unemployment. They said it was wrong to suppose, as most economists had up to then, that governments could lower the rate of unemployment if only they would accept a little more inflation. This imagined trade-off, they argued, was a trap: governments that tolerated higher inflation in the hope of lowering unemployment would find that joblessness dipped only briefly before returning to its previous level, while inflation would rise and stay put.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Up the NAIRU without a paddle”
More from Finance & economics
China meets its official growth target. Not everyone is convinced
For one thing, 2024 saw the second-weakest rise in nominal GDP since the 1970s
Ethiopia gets a stockmarket. Now it just needs some firms to list
The country is no longer the most populous without a bourse
Are big cities overrated?
New economic research suggests so
Why catastrophe bonds are failing to cover disaster damage
The innovative form of insurance is reaching its limits
“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson
It is a finite, sequential, incomplete information game
Will Donald Trump unleash Wall Street?
Bankers have plenty of reason to be hopeful