Finance & economics

Up the NAIRU without a paddle

In the 1970s, mainstream thinking on unemployment converted to a new conservative orthodoxy. Now, liberals are making those ideas their own

|

IN 1968 Milton Friedman and Edmund Phelps, in papers written independently, assaulted the prevailing consensus on unemployment. They said it was wrong to suppose, as most economists had up to then, that governments could lower the rate of unemployment if only they would accept a little more inflation. This imagined trade-off, they argued, was a trap: governments that tolerated higher inflation in the hope of lowering unemployment would find that joblessness dipped only briefly before returning to its previous level, while inflation would rise and stay put.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Up the NAIRU without a paddle”

Six months on

From the March 8th 1997 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance & economics

China meets its official growth target. Not everyone is convinced

For one thing, 2024 saw the second-weakest rise in nominal GDP since the 1970s

Ethiopia's Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed speaks during the launch of the Ethiopian Securities Exchange in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, on January 10th 2025

Ethiopia gets a stockmarket. Now it just needs some firms to list

The country is no longer the most populous without a bourse


Shibuya crossing in Tokyo, Japan

Are big cities overrated?

New economic research suggests so


Why catastrophe bonds are failing to cover disaster damage 

The innovative form of insurance is reaching its limits

“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson

It is a finite, sequential, incomplete information game

Will Donald Trump unleash Wall Street?

Bankers have plenty of reason to be hopeful