Editing Roald Dahl for sensitivity was silly
It was also a sign of a deeper rotsomeness in British publishing
Why stop at fatness? If you are going to put a red pen through Roald Dahl—as his publisher, Puffin, did recently—there are so many better bits to choose. The sensitivity readers contented themselves with excising such words as “fat”, “flabby”, “ugly” and “Kipling”. But Dahl doesn’t merely offer sexism, racism and colonialism; in his adult fiction you can find sins so frankly filthsome and swigpilling there has yet to be an -ism coined to cover them. There is violence, voyeurism and an unforgettably frightsome story in which a scorpion collector accidentally has sex with a leper. Not for nothing did his family call him “Roald the Rotten” and—more bluntly—“Roald the Bastard”.
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “Censory deprivation”
Britain March 25th 2023
- The machine that runs Britain’s state needs an overhaul
- “Honest” Boris Johnson looks done for
- The race to succeed Nicola Sturgeon has plunged the SNP into turmoil
- Louise Casey says the Met is institutionally misogynistic
- The British government attempts to take on the NHS’s workforce problems
- Editing Roald Dahl for sensitivity was silly
From the March 25th 2023 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionMore from Britain
Has the Royal Navy become too timid?
A new paper examines how its culture has changed
A plan to reorganise local government in England runs into opposition
Turkeys vote against Christmas
David Lammy’s plan to shake up Britain’s Foreign Office
Diplomats will be tasked with growing the economy and cutting migration
Britain’s government has spooked markets and riled businesses
Tax rises were inevitable. Such a shaky start was not
Labour’s credibility trap
Who can believe Rachel Reeves?