The FDA approves the first-ever non-prescription birth-control pill
Progressives hope it will blunt the effect of abortion bans
If the decision was sobering, the concurring opinion was chilling. When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade, making states the new arbiters of abortion policy, Justice Clarence Thomas laid out a blueprint for what could come next. Harnessing the same legal logic that the court used to topple Roe, he called on his colleagues to do away with a trio of other precedents. Among them was Griswold v Connecticut, a 1965 case that established a married couple’s right to buy contraceptives without government restriction. Wide-eyed progressives braced for abortion battles to morph into a war over birth control.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Pill pushers”
United States July 22nd 2023
- Americans are moving to places besieged by extreme heat
- The FDA approves the first-ever non-prescription birth-control pill
- Ron DeSantis is relying on big donors and his super PAC
- What America’s bike-share schemes tell you about venture capital
- How Mexico has become the “enemy” of America’s Republicans
- The case for a third-party campaign in 2024 is actuarial, not ideological
More from United States
Pam Bondi seems like a relatively safe pair of hands
But is America’s next attorney-general an independent operator?
Checks and Balance newsletter: Joe Biden’s farewell shot at the oligarchy
The outgoing president warns of a new “tech-industrial complex”
A protest against America’s TikTok ban is mired in contradiction
Another Chinese app is not the alternative some young Americans think it is
Joe Biden wound up serving Donald Trump
In some ways, his administration will look less like an interregnum than like MAGA-lite
How bad will the smoke be for Angelenos’ health?
Expect more sickness and disrupted schooling
Should you have to prove your age before watching porn?
America’s Supreme Court weighs a Texan law aimed at protecting kids