The FDA approves the first-ever non-prescription birth-control pill
Progressives hope it will blunt the effect of abortion bans
If the decision was sobering, the concurring opinion was chilling. When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade, making states the new arbiters of abortion policy, Justice Clarence Thomas laid out a blueprint for what could come next. Harnessing the same legal logic that the court used to topple Roe, he called on his colleagues to do away with a trio of other precedents. Among them was Griswold v Connecticut, a 1965 case that established a married couple’s right to buy contraceptives without government restriction. Wide-eyed progressives braced for abortion battles to morph into a war over birth control.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Pill pushers”
United States July 22nd 2023
- Americans are moving to places besieged by extreme heat
- The FDA approves the first-ever non-prescription birth-control pill
- Ron DeSantis is relying on big donors and his super PAC
- What America’s bike-share schemes tell you about venture capital
- How Mexico has become the “enemy” of America’s Republicans
- The case for a third-party campaign in 2024 is actuarial, not ideological
Discover more
Does Donald Trump have unlimited authority to impose tariffs?
Yes, but other factors could hold him back
As Jack Smith exits, Donald Trump’s allies hint at retribution
The president-elect hopes to hand the justice department to loyalists
Democratic states are preparing for Donald Trump’s return
But Mr Trump will be more prepared, too
Donald Trump and Tulsi Gabbard are coming for the spooks
The president-elect’s intelligence picks suggest a radical agenda
Checks and Balance newsletter: Trump is embracing a shift in Republican priorities
Will he follow through on his policy commitments?
Matt Gaetz withdraws from consideration as America’s attorney-general
Will the Senate be brave enough to block Donald Trump’s other outlandish nominees?