The British budget combines large numbers and a narrow vision
A bigger state but an irrational way to fund it
Rachel Reeves, Britain’s chancellor of the exchequer, will never have a better moment to make bold changes than the budget she presented on October 30th. She had a mandate to fix public services, a huge parliamentary majority and four months to work out how to raise taxes and encourage growth. In the end, she offered an odd mix of eye-popping numbers and small-bore thinking. She has taken steps to fix Britain’s crumbling public services, chronic underinvestment and fairy-tale fiscal forecasts. But she has lost her best chance at reform.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Large numbers, narrow vision”
Discover more
Peace in Lebanon is just a start
Donald Trump must build on Joe Biden’s belated success
From Nixon to China, to Trump to Tehran
Iran is weak. For America’s next president that creates an opportunity
Too many master’s courses are expensive and flaky
Governments should help postgraduates get a better deal
Elon Musk is Donald Trump’s disrupter-in-chief
The entrepreneur will be let loose on America’s government
Why British MPs should vote for assisted dying
A long-awaited liberal reform is in jeopardy
Germany cannot afford to wait to relax its debt brake
It should move before the election