How “judge-mandering” is eroding trust in America’s judiciary
The assignment of judges to cases should be random, not political
When Matthew Kacsmaryk issued a ruling in April 2023 suspending the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of mifepristone, an abortion pill, Democrats were furious. How could a lone judge in small-town Texas deprive millions of American women of a drug that has been deemed by doctors to be safer than Tylenol?
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Stop judge-mandering”
Leaders May 11th 2024
- What companies can expect if Labour wins Britain’s election
- The liberal international order is slowly coming apart
- How “judge-mandering” is eroding trust in America’s judiciary
- The world’s most improbable success story still needs to evolve
- Threats to Europe’s economy are mounting. Finance can help fortify it
- How to pacify the world’s most violent region
From the May 11th 2024 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionMore from Leaders
How to improve clinical trials
Involving more participants can lead to new medical insights
Houthi Inc: the pirates who weaponised globalisation
Their Red Sea protection racket is a disturbing glimpse into an anarchic world
Donald Trump will upend 80 years of American foreign policy
A superpower’s approach to the world is about to be turned on its head
Rising bond yields should spur governments to go for growth
The bond sell-off may partly reflect America’s productivity boom
Much of the damage from the LA fires could have been averted
The lesson of the tragedy is that better incentives will keep people safe
Health warnings about alcohol give only half the story
Enjoyment matters as well as risk