Oh, what a carry on
Might it be time for airlines to restrict both luggage and children on planes?
“I FEEL about airplanes the way I feel about diets. They are wonderful things for other people to go on,” Jean Kerr, an American dramatist, once quipped. Flying has become safer, faster and cheaper, but it seems ever more stressful. Having successfully fought for increased competition, to cut airfares, The Economist has now shifted its attention to relieving the stress. One frequent cause is the noise that children, especially bored ones, inflict on other travellers. A year ago, we proposed that all planes should have child-free zones, just like no-smoking zones: children (and parents) should be confined to the back of the plane. As yet, sadly, no airline seems to agree that children should be screened and not heard.
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Oh, what a carry on”
More from Leaders
How to improve clinical trials
Involving more participants can lead to new medical insights
Houthi Inc: the pirates who weaponised globalisation
Their Red Sea protection racket is a disturbing glimpse into an anarchic world
Donald Trump will upend 80 years of American foreign policy
A superpower’s approach to the world is about to be turned on its head
Rising bond yields should spur governments to go for growth
The bond sell-off may partly reflect America’s productivity boom
Much of the damage from the LA fires could have been averted
The lesson of the tragedy is that better incentives will keep people safe
Health warnings about alcohol give only half the story
Enjoyment matters as well as risk