Who needs a state pension?
Britain's Tories, staring election defeat in the face, have come up with a startling plan to replace state pensions. A pity they waited so long
PROMISING to privatise the basic state pension just before a general election looks like an act of political suicide. But on March 5th Britain's Conservative government unveiled proposals intended to lead, eventually, to the end of state-pension provision for most people. Perhaps the Tories reckon that, facing humiliation at the polls, they have little to lose. And yet, even if that is so, give them some credit. What they have proposed is bolder than any plan endorsed by any mainstream political party in the industrialised world--including Newt Gingrich's Republican “revolutionaries” of 1994. It also happens to make good sense. Despite being only eight weeks at most from a general election, the Tories have produced a plan that is workable, attractive and takes account of the undoubted difficulties that confront the project.
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Who needs a state pension?”
More from Leaders
How to improve clinical trials
Involving more participants can lead to new medical insights
Houthi Inc: the pirates who weaponised globalisation
Their Red Sea protection racket is a disturbing glimpse into an anarchic world
Donald Trump will upend 80 years of American foreign policy
A superpower’s approach to the world is about to be turned on its head
Rising bond yields should spur governments to go for growth
The bond sell-off may partly reflect America’s productivity boom
Much of the damage from the LA fires could have been averted
The lesson of the tragedy is that better incentives will keep people safe
Health warnings about alcohol give only half the story
Enjoyment matters as well as risk