Who needs a state pension?
Britain's Tories, staring election defeat in the face, have come up with a startling plan to replace state pensions. A pity they waited so long
PROMISING to privatise the basic state pension just before a general election looks like an act of political suicide. But on March 5th Britain's Conservative government unveiled proposals intended to lead, eventually, to the end of state-pension provision for most people. Perhaps the Tories reckon that, facing humiliation at the polls, they have little to lose. And yet, even if that is so, give them some credit. What they have proposed is bolder than any plan endorsed by any mainstream political party in the industrialised world--including Newt Gingrich's Republican “revolutionaries” of 1994. It also happens to make good sense. Despite being only eight weeks at most from a general election, the Tories have produced a plan that is workable, attractive and takes account of the undoubted difficulties that confront the project.
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Who needs a state pension?”
Discover more
How to make a success of peace talks with Vladimir Putin
The key is robust security guarantees for Ukrainians
Javier Milei: “My contempt for the state is infinite”
Argentina’s president is idolised by the Trumpian right. They should get to know him better
Donald Trump’s threats of tariffs will do harm, even if he does not impose them
The risk of a trade war is uncomfortably high
Peace in Lebanon is just a start
Donald Trump must build on Joe Biden’s belated success
From Nixon to China, to Trump to Tehran
Iran is weak. For America’s next president that creates an opportunity
Too many master’s courses are expensive and flaky
Governments should help postgraduates get a better deal