Leaders

Who needs a state pension?

Britain's Tories, staring election defeat in the face, have come up with a startling plan to replace state pensions. A pity they waited so long

|

PROMISING to privatise the basic state pension just before a general election looks like an act of political suicide. But on March 5th Britain's Conservative government unveiled proposals intended to lead, eventually, to the end of state-pension provision for most people. Perhaps the Tories reckon that, facing humiliation at the polls, they have little to lose. And yet, even if that is so, give them some credit. What they have proposed is bolder than any plan endorsed by any mainstream political party in the industrialised world--including Newt Gingrich's Republican “revolutionaries” of 1994. It also happens to make good sense. Despite being only eight weeks at most from a general election, the Tories have produced a plan that is workable, attractive and takes account of the undoubted difficulties that confront the project.

This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “Who needs a state pension?”

Six months on

From the March 8th 1997 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Leaders

Four test tubes in the shape of human figures, connected hand in hand, partially filled with a blue liquid. A dropper adds some liquid to the last figure

How to improve clinical trials

Involving more participants can lead to new medical insights

Container ship at sunrise in the Red Sea

Houthi Inc: the pirates who weaponised globalisation

Their Red Sea protection racket is a disturbing glimpse into an anarchic world


Donald Trump will upend 80 years of American foreign policy

A superpower’s approach to the world is about to be turned on its head


Rising bond yields should spur governments to go for growth

The bond sell-off may partly reflect America’s productivity boom

Much of the damage from the LA fires could have been averted

The lesson of the tragedy is that better incentives will keep people safe