A study suggests that higher minimum wages hit poorer bosses’ pockets
Wage floors are still progressive, but can have unintended consequences
A MINIMUM WAGE is supposed to redistribute money from rich to poor. But economists disagree about whether it actually does so. Some researchers, for example, have found that, in America, Canada and Europe, raising the minimum wage tends to decrease employment among the least-skilled workers, as firms downsize to trim costs. Others have found no effect on employment. And although no one doubts that the policy raises wages for the workers who stay employed, still unsettled is the question of where that extra money comes from.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Who pays?”
Finance & economics January 4th 2020
- The causes of a booming stockmarket are unlikely to last through 2020
- Trade negotiators have missed a deadline to help protect fish stocks
- Grab and Singtel will bid for a digital-banking licence in Singapore
- A study suggests that higher minimum wages hit poorer bosses’ pockets
- Why the most important hedge is against unexpected inflation
- China’s industrial policy has worked better than critics think
More from Finance & economics
China meets its official growth target. Not everyone is convinced
For one thing, 2024 saw the second-weakest rise in nominal GDP since the 1970s
Ethiopia gets a stockmarket. Now it just needs some firms to list
The country is no longer the most populous without a bourse
Are big cities overrated?
New economic research suggests so
Why catastrophe bonds are failing to cover disaster damage
The innovative form of insurance is reaching its limits
“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson
It is a finite, sequential, incomplete information game
Will Donald Trump unleash Wall Street?
Bankers have plenty of reason to be hopeful