China’s industrial policy has worked better than critics think
But the state-led model is creaking
EARLY IN ITS trade dispute with China, America declared that Chinese industrial policy was a form of “economic aggression”. America’s negotiators hoped to rein it in. No such luck. The very week in December that America and China announced a mini-deal on trade, China’s president, Xi Jinping, vowed that the Chinese government would do more in 2020 to support strategic sectors, ranging from robotics to biomedicine. Having seen its vulnerability to American export controls, China is more determined to build up its domestic abilities than it was before the trade war began.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Planned obsolescence”
Finance & economics January 4th 2020
- The causes of a booming stockmarket are unlikely to last through 2020
- Trade negotiators have missed a deadline to help protect fish stocks
- Grab and Singtel will bid for a digital-banking licence in Singapore
- A study suggests that higher minimum wages hit poorer bosses’ pockets
- Why the most important hedge is against unexpected inflation
- China’s industrial policy has worked better than critics think
More from Finance & economics
China meets its official growth target. Not everyone is convinced
For one thing, 2024 saw the second-weakest rise in nominal GDP since the 1970s
Ethiopia gets a stockmarket. Now it just needs some firms to list
The country is no longer the most populous without a bourse
Are big cities overrated?
New economic research suggests so
Why catastrophe bonds are failing to cover disaster damage
The innovative form of insurance is reaching its limits
“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson
It is a finite, sequential, incomplete information game
Will Donald Trump unleash Wall Street?
Bankers have plenty of reason to be hopeful