Finance & economics | Rating agencies

Reluctant watchdogs

Shunning a regulatory role

|New York

RATING agencies ought, by rights, to be thrilled that their services may be needed to set bank-capital requirements worldwide. Yet the two biggest firms, Standard & Poor's (S&P) and Moody's, are alarmed by proposals by the Basel Committee to use their credit ratings to set how much capital banks must put aside for each loan.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Reluctant watchdogs”

Mr Bush goes to Europe

From the June 9th 2001 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance & economics

China meets its official growth target. Not everyone is convinced

For one thing, 2024 saw the second-weakest rise in nominal GDP since the 1970s

Ethiopia's Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed speaks during the launch of the Ethiopian Securities Exchange in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, on January 10th 2025

Ethiopia gets a stockmarket. Now it just needs some firms to list

The country is no longer the most populous without a bourse


Shibuya crossing in Tokyo, Japan

Are big cities overrated?

New economic research suggests so


Why catastrophe bonds are failing to cover disaster damage 

The innovative form of insurance is reaching its limits

“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson

It is a finite, sequential, incomplete information game

Will Donald Trump unleash Wall Street?

Bankers have plenty of reason to be hopeful