Swiss multinationals narrowly avoid new ethics standards
A referendum on stakeholderism wins the popular vote but fails to secure enough support from cantons
CORPORATE CHIEFTAINS can barely keep tabs on what their own staff are up to, let alone suppliers and subsidiaries in far-flung places. A referendum in Switzerland on November 29th proposed to change that, making Swiss multinationals liable in domestic courts for lapses in human rights or environmental stewardship along their global supply chains. The proposal failed by the narrowest of margins—a watered-down version will come into force instead.
This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline “Swiss miss”
Business December 5th 2020
- The dawn of digital medicine
- The surprising resilience of American restaurant chains
- Volkswagen’s boss takes on the unions
- Congress wants to boot Chinese firms from American exchanges
- Salesforce gets some Slack
- How China’s Jin Jiang and Huazhu put Marriott and Hilton to shame
- Swiss multinationals narrowly avoid new ethics standards
- How the pandemic is forcing managers to work harder
Discover more
Elon Musk’s xAI goes after OpenAI
The fight is turning nasty
How to behave in lifts: an office guide
Life in an elevator
Donald Trump’s victory has boosted shares in private-prison companies
A hard line means hard cash
Gautam Adani faces bribery charges in America
Prosecutors allege one of India’s richest men paid off local officials
Nvidia’s boss dismisses fears that AI has hit a wall
But it’s “urgent” to get to the next level, Jensen Huang tells The Economist
Does Dallas offer a vision of America’s future?
The Texan city embodies the allure of small government