A sticking-plaster policy for Britain’s strained courts
Magistrates get more power. Will they get punch-drunk on it?
IT HAS BEEN a long day in courtroom number 5 at Stratford Magistrates’ Court by the time Charlie Mendajami enters the dock. The trio of magistrates have presided over eight cases, including those of a pale teenager who admitted to sharing indecent images (he gets a 24-month community order and 200 hours of unpaid work); a man who attacked a noisy neighbour’s door with a hammer (£650, or $820, fine; hammer confiscated); and a serial offender who stole a bike and punched a stranger (five weeks in prison).
Explore more
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “Sticking-plaster policies”
Britain November 23rd 2024
- Where British MPs should look before the vote on assisted dying
- How to fix palliative care in Britain
- Britain’s new government may cut the number of Channel crossings
- Britain’s government wants bigger pension funds
- The story of Britain’s “ginaissance”
- A sticking-plaster policy for Britain’s strained courts
- Assisted dying and the two concepts of liberty
From the November 23rd 2024 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionDiscover more
Are British voters as clueless as Labour’s intelligentsia thinks?
How the idea of false consciousness conquered the governing party
The best British companies to work for to get ahead
A new ranking of firms by pay, promotions and hiring practices
How the best British employers find and promote their staff
No degree? Some employers care much less than others
A tiny island fights the scourge of plastic on the beach
A Northern Irish experiment in recycling
How to fix palliative care in Britain
A big point of contention in the assisted-dying debate can be resolved fairly easily