Should Britons’ health be considered a national asset?
Persuading the Treasury that sickness is anti-growth
WES STREETING, the health secretary, likes to make a snappy prediction. If health spending keeps going up, he says, then Britain will end up like “the National Health Service with a little country attached to it”. It does not have to be this way, a number of think-tanks close to Labour insist. Instead of viewing health as a cost, they argue, Britain should think of it as an asset. The idea of investing in better health fits snugly with Mr Streeting’s plans to shift the focus of the NHS from hospitals to community care, from sickness to prevention. But it could also act as a supplement to boost Britain’s growth.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “A healthy balance-sheet”
Britain September 28th 2024
- What is Britain’s Labour government for?
- Britain’s budget choices are not as bad as the government says
- Much keener on Trump, less sure about Charles III
- Why did Mohamed Al Fayed escape scrutiny?
- The self-help book began in the land of the stiff upper lip
- Should Britons’ health be considered a national asset?
- Inside the chaos machine of British politics
Discover more
Are British voters as clueless as Labour’s intelligentsia thinks?
How the idea of false consciousness conquered the governing party
The best British companies to work for to get ahead
A new ranking of firms by pay, promotions and hiring practices
How the best British employers find and promote their staff
No degree? Some employers care much less than others
A tiny island fights the scourge of plastic on the beach
A Northern Irish experiment in recycling
A sticking-plaster policy for Britain’s strained courts
Magistrates get more power. Will they get punch-drunk on it?