A court bashes Uber into compliance—again
The latest blow may mean vast bill for back taxes
UBER HAS tried repeatedly to persuade others to see it the way it sees itself. Its drivers, the ride-hailing giant has said, are independent contractors with no right to minimum wage, holiday pay or pensions. The drivers, for their part, point out that they are managed algorithmically and cannot set prices or routes. Courts have taken their side. In 2016 the Employment Tribunal ruled that Uber drivers were entitled to minimum wage and holiday pay. Uber lost three appeals, most recently in the Supreme Court in February. On December 6th it was dealt another legal blow when the High Court, in effect, ruled that its entire business model broke the rules.
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “Cost drivers”
Britain December 11th 2021
- Behind the chaos and scandal of Boris Johnson’s government lies stasis
- A court bashes Uber into compliance—again
- For the clinically vulnerable, “Freedom Day” has yet to arrive
- Britain is liberalising its listing rules to revive its battered bourse
- Nostalgia and the profit motive have created a market in old phone kiosks
- The robots are gathering to help beat Britain’s supply-chain shortages
- Britain’s new suburbs are peculiar places
More from Britain
Has the Royal Navy become too timid?
A new paper examines how its culture has changed
A plan to reorganise local government in England runs into opposition
Turkeys vote against Christmas
David Lammy’s plan to shake up Britain’s Foreign Office
Diplomats will be tasked with growing the economy and cutting migration
Britain’s government has spooked markets and riled businesses
Tax rises were inevitable. Such a shaky start was not
Labour’s credibility trap
Who can believe Rachel Reeves?