Who bears risk—people or government?
Covid-19 is drawing the state back into the insurance business
RARELY, IF EVER, has a proposal moved from policy paper to implementation in a matter of days. The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme was first proposed by the Resolution Foundation, a think-tank, on March 19th as the scale of the hit to the economy from the pandemic became clearer. Four days later, on March 23rd, Rishi Sunak, the chancellor, made the furlough scheme the centrepiece of the government’s economic response to the virus. Initially due to run for just three months, it will now be in place until at least October and is currently paying 80% of the wages, up to £2,500 ($3,200) a month, of nearly 9m British workers. It costs the Treasury about the same each month as the National Health Service (NHS).
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “The great risk shift”
Britain June 13th 2020
- The Colston statue and Britain’s legacy of slavery
- Why the Conservative Party adores Australia
- Britain’s new quarantine rules are a head-scratcher
- Britons are dreaming more
- How to get jury trials back on track
- Lockdown and the toilet problem
- Who bears risk—people or government?
- Johnson and Starmer fight for the working-class vote
More from Britain
Has the Royal Navy become too timid?
A new paper examines how its culture has changed
A plan to reorganise local government in England runs into opposition
Turkeys vote against Christmas
David Lammy’s plan to shake up Britain’s Foreign Office
Diplomats will be tasked with growing the economy and cutting migration
Britain’s government has spooked markets and riled businesses
Tax rises were inevitable. Such a shaky start was not
Labour’s credibility trap
Who can believe Rachel Reeves?