Britain | Immigration

After the flood

The government has discovered the virtues of economic migration. But it is unlikely to advertise them too vigorously

|

ASPIRING economic migrants to Britain must be scratching their heads. Only a few months ago, government and opposition politicians were queuing up to denounce what some described as the “flood” of “bogus” asylum-seekers arriving in Britain. Many, they said, were merely economic migrants in disguise, intent on lucrative careers as scroungers and squeegee merchants. Yet on September 11th, in what seems like a perplexing re-think, a government minister will make a speech extolling the benefits to Britain of economic migration, historically and in the future. Last week a scheme began under which foreign entrepreneurs can move to Britain with nothing to declare but a good business plan—previously they had to bring £200,000 ($290,000) with them.

This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “After the flood”

Is oil poised to strike?

From the September 9th 2000 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Discover more

British MPs vote in favour of assisted dying

A monumental social reform is closer to being realised

This illustration depicts Keith Starmer and Rachel Reeves set against a background of UK, US, and Chinese flag elements.

The slow death of a Labour buzzword

And what that says about Britain’s place in the world



Britain’s Supreme Court considers what a woman is

At last. Britons had been wondering what those 34m people who are not men might be

Can potholes fuel populism?

A new paper looks at one explanation for the rise of Reform UK

Are British voters as clueless as Labour’s intelligentsia thinks? 

How the idea of false consciousness conquered the governing party