Two presidents compete over the worst abuse of the pardon power
Donald Trump and Joe Biden have both made indefensible decisions
American presidents are often disappointed to discover limits to their authority, but the country’s founders intended the nearly absolute pardon power to be an exception. Alexander Hamilton, for example, believed that legislators should not be involved in the pardons process because “one man appears to be a more eligible dispenser of the mercy of government, than a body of men.” Americans might now question the wisdom of bestowing such responsibility on men like Joe Biden and Donald Trump.
Explore more
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “The quality of mercy”
United States January 25th 2025
- Two presidents compete over the worst abuse of the pardon power
- Donald Trump has rewritten the history of January 6th
- Ross Ulbricht, pardoned by Donald Trump, was a pioneer of crypto-crime
- Donald Trump cries “invasion” to justify an immigration crackdown
- To end birthright citizenship, Donald Trump misreads the constitution
- An unfinished election may shape a swing state’s future
- America really could enter a golden age
More from United States
An unfinished election may shape a swing state’s future
A Supreme Court race ended very close. Then the lawyers arrived.
Donald Trump cries “invasion” to justify an immigration crackdown
His executive orders range from benign to belligerent
To end birthright citizenship, Donald Trump misreads the constitution
A change would also create huge practical problems
Ross Ulbricht, pardoned by Donald Trump, was a pioneer of crypto-crime
His dark website, the Silk Road, was to crime what Napster was to music
Donald Trump has rewritten the history of January 6th
By pardoning violent offenders, he ignored his own team’s advice
Following Trump’s pardons, the Proud Boys are back in the game
Enrique Tarrio tells The Economist he is still figuring out what is next for the group