The Supreme Court declines to upend American election law
A fringe theory gets a chilly reception from the justices
IN THE RUN-UP to the 2020 presidential election—and in its fraught denouement—supporters of Donald Trump turned to a novel theory to boost their candidate’s chances of staying in the White House. Citing the “independent state legislature” theory, they sought to block state-court rulings in Pennsylvania and elsewhere that made voting easier during the covid-19 pandemic by, for instance, extending deadlines for mail-in ballots. And after election day, legal advisers drew on the notion in cooking up a radical scheme to replace electors in states won by Joe Biden with “alternative” slates for Mr Trump.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “A victory for democracy”
United States July 1st 2023
- America aims for nuclear-power renaissance
- Massachusetts is not the gun-control beacon it once was
- What the rise of student consulting clubs means
- In North Carolina a jilted husband can sue his wife’s lover
- The Supreme Court declines to upend American election law
- Why many American states and cities are changing their flags
- AI is making Washington smarter
More from United States
Pam Bondi seems like a relatively safe pair of hands
But is America’s next attorney-general an independent operator?
Checks and Balance newsletter: Joe Biden’s farewell shot at the oligarchy
The outgoing president warns of a new “tech-industrial complex”
A protest against America’s TikTok ban is mired in contradiction
Another Chinese app is not the alternative some young Americans think it is
Joe Biden wound up serving Donald Trump
In some ways, his administration will look less like an interregnum than like MAGA-lite
How bad will the smoke be for Angelenos’ health?
Expect more sickness and disrupted schooling
Should you have to prove your age before watching porn?
America’s Supreme Court weighs a Texan law aimed at protecting kids