Abortions have become 6% rarer since the end of Roe v Wade
That overall number disguises a huge variation between states
After the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organisation last June, which reversed its decision in Roe v Wade and let states ban abortion, the biggest remaining question was what effect the change would have. On paper, Roe established a nationwide right to abortion. However, conservative states had already implemented rules before Dobbs that made abortions, though technically legal, very hard to obtain. Liberal states, in contrast, were unlikely to impose new restrictions. Were Roe’s protections worth as much in practice as in principle?
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Rulings have consequences”
United States April 22nd 2023
- The Dominion lawsuit showed the limits of Fox’s influence over its audience
- Abortions have become 6% rarer since the end of Roe v Wade
- Rural Americans are importing tiny Japanese pickup trucks
- The Daniel Perry case shows the contradictions of gun enthusiasts in Texas
- America’s Supreme Court weighs religious accommodations in the workplace
- American religion is becoming less exceptional
- Detroit is working again
Discover more
Does Donald Trump have unlimited authority to impose tariffs?
Yes, but other factors could hold him back
As Jack Smith exits, Donald Trump’s allies hint at retribution
The president-elect hopes to hand the justice department to loyalists
Democratic states are preparing for Donald Trump’s return
But Mr Trump will be more prepared, too
Donald Trump and Tulsi Gabbard are coming for the spooks
The president-elect’s intelligence picks suggest a radical agenda
Checks and Balance newsletter: Trump is embracing a shift in Republican priorities
Will he follow through on his policy commitments?
Matt Gaetz withdraws from consideration as America’s attorney-general
Will the Senate be brave enough to block Donald Trump’s other outlandish nominees?