Why winning a Wisconsin Supreme Court race matters so much
In a gridlocked, gerrymandered state, it is the Democrats’ best hope for change
ELECTING JUDGES is fundamentally odd. The perfect example of this is the race to fill an open seat for the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The two candidates met for the only debate of the campaign on March 21st. Daniel Kelly, the relative conservative, insisted in his closing remarks that he was completely apolitical. “We must not talk about politics,” he said. The moderator, a political journalist who had asked mostly political questions, thanked the debate’s sponsor, a website called WisPolitics.com. Journalists then flocked to Mr Kelly’s press adviser, a Republican Party activist and former candidate for lieutenant-governor, to try to get interviews.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Full-court press”
United States April 1st 2023
- Both America’s political camps agree that TikTok is troubling
- Perils grow as America and Russia stop sharing data on nukes
- School-voucher schemes are spreading across America
- Chicago tries to export its most unpleasant drink
- Why winning a Wisconsin Supreme Court race matters so much
- How to write the perfect 2024 campaign book
More from United States
Pam Bondi seems like a relatively safe pair of hands
But is America’s next attorney-general an independent operator?
Checks and Balance newsletter: Joe Biden’s farewell shot at the oligarchy
The outgoing president warns of a new “tech-industrial complex”
A protest against America’s TikTok ban is mired in contradiction
Another Chinese app is not the alternative some young Americans think it is
Joe Biden wound up serving Donald Trump
In some ways, his administration will look less like an interregnum than like MAGA-lite
How bad will the smoke be for Angelenos’ health?
Expect more sickness and disrupted schooling
Should you have to prove your age before watching porn?
America’s Supreme Court weighs a Texan law aimed at protecting kids