America tussles over a newly fashionable constitutional theory
“Originalism” is pushing the law to the right. Could it be a tool for progressives?
In 1987, the last time the Senate voted to reject a president’s pick for the Supreme Court, a constitutional theory seemingly went down with the nominee. Robert Bork, Ronald Reagan’s ill-fated choice, told senators that judges should be guided not by their own lights but by the intentions of those who drafted the constitution. To read values into it that the framers “did not put there”, he said (referring to liberal rulings of the 1960s and 1970s, among others), is to “deprive the people of their liberty”. Roe v Wade, and rulings such as that protecting a right to contraception, were wrong or even “pernicious”: they had nothing to do with the true meaning of the constitution.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “History test”
United States August 20th 2022
- Merrick Garland is not naive about political violence
- In New York, once-friendly neighbours now battle it out
- A new ranked-choice voting system hampers Sarah Palin’s hopes
- America’s government is buying vulnerable homes amid rising flood risk
- A push for more space for America’s farm animals is thwarted
- America tussles over a newly fashionable constitutional theory
- Democrats are wrong to give up on rural America
Discover more
An FBI sting operation catches Jackson’s mayor taking big bribes
What the sensational undoing of the black leader means for Mississippi’s failing capital
America’s rural-urban divide nurtures wannabe state-splitters
What’s behind a new wave of secessionism
Does Donald Trump have unlimited authority to impose tariffs?
Yes, but other factors could hold him back
As Jack Smith exits, Donald Trump’s allies hint at retribution
The president-elect hopes to hand the Justice Department to loyalists
Democratic states are preparing for Donald Trump’s return
But Mr Trump will be more prepared, too
Donald Trump and Tulsi Gabbard are coming for the spooks
The president-elect’s intelligence picks suggest a radical agenda