The limits of energy independence
The Trump administration is ill-equipped for a Middle-East crisis that looks increasingly likely
EVEN WHEN American policy in the Middle East has been about more than oil, it has been about oil. That has sometimes been jarringly obvious, as when Dwight Eisenhower justified his decision to send troops to the region in 1958 on the basis that it was the “birthplace of three great religions”, as well as having “two-thirds of the presently known oil deposits”. At other times the oiliness of America’s policy has been more subtle, or partial. George W. Bush invaded Iraq in 2003 for several reasons: to secure its weapons of mass destruction, to spread democracy, and, his would-be successor John McCain acknowledged, to guarantee America’s oil supply.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “The limits of energy independence”
United States April 25th 2020
- America begins easing restrictions
- Think a respiratory virus pandemic is a good time to cut air-quality regulations?
- The havoc wrought by covid-19 will spark new concern over bio-weapons
- The fight with Huawei means America can’t shape tech rules
- The Trump campaign makes its pitch to Catholic voters
- The limits of energy independence
Discover more
Donald Trump may find it harder to dominate America’s conversation
A more fragmented media is tougher to manage
An FBI sting operation catches Jackson’s mayor taking big bribes
What the sensational undoing of the black leader means for Mississippi’s failing capital
America’s rural-urban divide nurtures wannabe state-splitters
What’s behind a new wave of secessionism
Does Donald Trump have unlimited authority to impose tariffs?
Yes, but other factors could hold him back
As Jack Smith exits, Donald Trump’s allies hint at retribution
The president-elect hopes to hand the Justice Department to loyalists
Democratic states are preparing for Donald Trump’s return
But Mr Trump will be more prepared, too