United States | Arguing over Iran

Fighting talk

It hasn’t derailed the deal. But American Jews’ rancour over Iran still matters

The disputatious diaspora
|ATLANTA

ACCORDING to the Talmud, the Romans were able to conquer Jerusalem and drive the Jews into exile because of the debilitating rifts among them. Some aghast rabbis have cited this ancient warning to temper the rancour among American Jews over the deal to constrain Iran’s nuclear programme, struck in July by Barack Obama and five other governments. Opposition from some Jews (and many others), based on anxieties about Israeli security and Iran’s genocidal rhetoric, has not derailed the agreement, which this week secured enough support in the Senate to survive. But the debate has divided synagogues across the country, a spasm of infighting that may yet prove momentous, albeit not as Mr Obama’s critics intended.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Fighting talk”

Washington, we have a problem...

From the September 5th 2015 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Discover more

Jackson Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba addresses the media after pleading not guilty to federal charges at the Thad Cochran United States Courthouse in Jackson.

An FBI sting operation catches Jackson’s mayor taking big bribes

What the sensational undoing of the black leader means for Mississippi’s failing capital

Downtown of Metropolis, Illinois, showing the Super Museum and a gift shop.

America’s rural-urban divide nurtures wannabe state-splitters

What’s behind a new wave of secessionism


A container ship sails as the sun sets in Bayonne, New Jersey, United States.

Does Donald Trump have unlimited authority to impose tariffs?

Yes, but other factors could hold him back


As Jack Smith exits, Donald Trump’s allies hint at retribution

The president-elect hopes to hand the Justice Department to loyalists

Donald Trump and Tulsi Gabbard are coming for the spooks

The president-elect’s intelligence picks suggest a radical agenda