Please let us
No, says the Supreme Court
THE light is dim, the air pungent, but the cheerful patter of bingo numbers hardly suggests a den of iniquity. At the San Francisco Patients Resource Centre (SFPRC), near Haight-Ashbury, cannabis is still being dispensed, and people who find it relieves the pain of AIDS or cancer, or the unpleasant side-effects of medicine, are still smoking it. Indeed, says Sister Rosemarie, a nun who is one of the centre's three directors, business has been brisker than usual since the Supreme Court's decision, on May 14th, that “medical necessity” provides no exemption from the law's ban on the distribution of marijuana.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Please let us”
More from United States
A protest against America’s TikTok ban is mired in contradiction
Another Chinese app is not the alternative some young Americans think it is
How Joe Biden wound up serving Donald Trump
In some ways, his administration will look less like an interregnum than like MAGA-lite
How bad will the smoke be for Angelenos’ health?
Expect more sickness and disrupted schooling
Should you have to prove your age before watching porn?
America’s Supreme Court weighs a Texan law aimed at protecting kids
Tulsi Gabbard, Sean Penn and the hunt for an American hostage
A controversial trip to Syria in 2017 produced a possible sighting of Austin Tice, an imprisoned journalist
How flush Americans feel depends on their views of Donald Trump
Republicans expect a Trumponomics boom, Democrats dread a bust