Science & technology | Climate change

Burning Bush

A new report from America’s National Academy of Sciences confirms the reality of global warming

|

THREE months ago, George Bush's fledgling administration dropped two public-relations bricks over the issue of global warming. First, Mr Bush refused to stand by his campaign pledge to regulate emissions of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that is widely believed to be a big cause of global warming. That sparked a backlash from American environmentalist groups. Second, he annoyed a lot of people overseas by trumpeting, in undiplomatic terms, his long-standing opposition to the Kyoto Protocol. This is a United Nations treaty agreed to (though not yet much ratified) by most industrialised countries, that calls for binding cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions.

This article appeared in the Science & technology section of the print edition under the headline “Burning Bush”

Does inequality matter?

From the June 16th 2001 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Science & technology

A silhouette view of the peloton

Why carbon monoxide could appeal to the discerning doper

Professional cycling is debating whether to ban the poisonous gas

Drainage canals (linear features that drain into a small meandering river) seen from above.

A sophisticated civilisation once flourished in the Amazon basin

How the Casarabe died out remains a mystery


Three rotated avocados made from small numbers

Heritable Agriculture, a Google spinout, is bringing AI to crop breeding

By reducing the cost of breeding, the firm hopes to improve yields and other properties for an array of important crops


Could supersonic air travel make a comeback?

Boom Supersonic’s demonstrator jet exceeds Mach 1

Should you worry about microplastics?

Little is known about the effects on humans—but limiting exposure to them seems prudent

Wasps stole genes from viruses

That probably assisted their evolutionary diversification