International | Street protests

The weapon of choice

Bloodshed sometimes helps autocrats stay in power. It rarely benefits protesters

“THE little screaming fact that sounds through all history”, John Steinbeck wrote, is that “repression works only to strengthen and knit the repressed.” The standard Western critique of skull-crackers on the streets of Cairo, Moscow or Tehran is “You will regret it.” But will they? History’s lessons regarding protests and violence are more complex. Bloodshed sometimes works for autocrats, at least temporarily. But for protesters themselves, taking up arms is usually a mistake.

This article appeared in the International section of the print edition under the headline “The weapon of choice”

The new face of terror

From the September 28th 2013 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Discover more

The world is losing the fight against international gangs

Globalisation and technological progress are leading to a boom in organised crime

COP29 UNFCCC Climate Conference In Baku

Half a loaf, at best, from the climate talks

This year’s negotiations made very modest progress


Is your master’s degree useless?

New data show a shockingly high proportion of courses are a waste of money


The perils of appeasing a warlike Russia

Finland’s cold-war past offers urgent lessons for Ukraine’s future

The danger zone between two presidents

The world’s bad actors will relish any power vacuum

How to avoid Oval Office humiliation

A dozen officials offer tips on the dangerous art of Trump-flattery