Why economic warfare nearly always misses its target
There is no such thing as a strategic commodity
Between August and October 1943 American warplanes repeatedly bombed Schweinfurt, in southern Germany. The Bavarian town did not host army HQs or a major garrison. But it produced half of the Third Reich’s supply of ball bearings, used to keep axles rotating in everything from aircraft and tank engines to automatic rifles. To Allied planners, who had spent months studying the input-output tables of German industry, the minuscule manufacturing part had the trappings of a strategic commodity. Knock away Germany’s ability to make them, the thinking went, and its military-industrial complex would come crashing down.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “The strategic-commodity fallacy”
Finance & economics October 5th 2024
- Xi Jinping’s belated stimulus has reset the mood in Chinese markets
- Why is Canada’s economy falling behind America’s?
- A tonne of public debt is never made public
- Can Andrea Orcel, Europe’s star banker, create a super-bank?
- The house-price supercycle is just getting going
- Why economic warfare nearly always misses its target
More from Finance & economics
China meets its official growth target. Not everyone is convinced
For one thing, 2024 saw the second-weakest rise in nominal GDP since the 1970s
Ethiopia gets a stockmarket. Now it just needs some firms to list
The country is no longer the most populous without a bourse
Are big cities overrated?
New economic research suggests so
Why catastrophe bonds are failing to cover disaster damage
The innovative form of insurance is reaching its limits
“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson
It is a finite, sequential, incomplete information game
Will Donald Trump unleash Wall Street?
Bankers have plenty of reason to be hopeful