An American sovereign-wealth fund is a risky idea
Donald Trump’s latest proposal has worryingly broad support
Not long ago America’s main concern with sovereign-wealth funds was how to regulate these large pools of money controlled by foreign governments. Now, seemingly overnight, the hot new idea in Washington, DC, is that America should join the club. It is easy to understand the allure. A well-managed SWF can, in theory, let the government direct more cash towards its strategic aims, without—if returns are strong—the need to raise taxes. In practice, achieving this balance is difficult. In America a SWF looks like a risky solution to a problem that does not truly exist.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Presidential proposal”
Finance & economics September 14th 2024
- Can anything spark Europe’s economy back to life?
- Norway’s weak currency presents a mystery
- Strangely, America’s companies will soon face higher interest rates
- Can bonds keep beating stocks?
- China’s government is surprisingly redistributive
- The IMF has a protest problem
- Why orange juice has never been more expensive
- An American sovereign-wealth fund is a risky idea
More from Finance & economics
China meets its official growth target. Not everyone is convinced
For one thing, 2024 saw the second-weakest rise in nominal GDP since the 1970s
Ethiopia gets a stockmarket. Now it just needs some firms to list
The country is no longer the most populous without a bourse
Are big cities overrated?
New economic research suggests so
Why catastrophe bonds are failing to cover disaster damage
The innovative form of insurance is reaching its limits
“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson
It is a finite, sequential, incomplete information game
Will Donald Trump unleash Wall Street?
Bankers have plenty of reason to be hopeful