Finance & economics | Buttonwood

How the “Magnificent Seven” misleads

Forget the supergroup of stockmarket darlings

Illustration of seven horses in the shape of a seven, with circles and arrows over them, like a game plan
Illustration: Satoshi Kambayashi

All models are wrong, goes the statisticians’ adage, but some are useful. This time last year, plenty of pundits’ models started looking more wrong and less useful. The consensus forecast was a grim spell for economic growth and a dreary one for stock prices—and that was before a clutch of American regional banks buckled. Higher interest rates seemed set to cause pain everywhere. Instead, in the very country where the banking turmoil unfolded, the stockmarket began to soar. By the summer America’s S&P 500 index of leading shares had risen by 28% from a trough hit the previous autumn. Analysts hunted for a new model to explain what was going on, and the popular choice revolved around the “Magnificent Seven”.

Explore more

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “AI revoir”

From the March 30th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Discover more

Calendar with shopping related iconography in each day

Why Black Friday sales grow more annoying every year

Nobody is to blame. Everyone suffers

Donald Trump in Brownsville, Texas on November 19th 2024

Trump wastes no time in reigniting trade wars

Canada and Mexico look likely to suffer


Illustration of a large anvil falling down on a government building.

How Trump, Starmer and Macron can avoid a debt crunch

With deficits soaring, their finance ministers will have to be smart


What Scott Bessent’s appointment means for the Trump administration

The president-elect’s nominee for treasury secretary faces a gruelling job

What Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders get wrong about credit cards

Forget interest rates. Rewards are the real problem

Computers unleashed economic growth. Will artificial intelligence?

Two years after ChatGPT-3.5 arrived, progress has been slower than expected