Are passive funds to blame for market mania?
They have killed off many of those willing to bet on a downturn
The year is 2034. America’s “magnificent seven” firms make up almost the entirety of the country’s stockmarket. For Jensen Huang, the boss of Nvidia, another knockout quarterly profit means another dizzy proclamation of a “tipping point” in artificial intelligence. Nobody is listening. The long march of passive investing has put the last stockpickers and stock-watchers out of a job. Index mutual and exchange-traded funds (ETFs)—which buy a bunch of stocks rather than guessing which ones will perform best—dominate markets completely. Capitalism’s big questions are hashed out in private between a few tech bosses and asset managers.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Too efficient”
Finance & economics March 2nd 2024
- Stockmarkets are booming. But the good times are unlikely to last
- Are passive funds to blame for market mania?
- Activist investing is no longer the preserve of hedge-fund sharks
- How Trump and Biden have failed to cut ties with China
- Uranium prices are soaring. Investors should be careful
- What do you do with 191bn frozen euros owned by Russia?
Discover more
Trump wastes no time in reigniting trade wars
Canada and Mexico look likely to suffer
How Trump, Starmer and Macron can avoid a debt crunch
With deficits soaring, their finance ministers will have to be smart
What Scott Bessent’s appointment means for the Trump administration
The president-elect’s nominee for treasury secretary faces a gruelling job
What Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders get wrong about credit cards
Forget interest rates. Rewards are the real problem
Computers unleashed economic growth. Will artificial intelligence?
Two years after ChatGPT-3.5 arrived, progress has been slower than expected
Should investors just give up on stocks outside America?
No, but it is getting a lot harder to keep the faith