How to avoid a fatal backlash against globalisation
Studying how the first era ended could help preserve the second
IN 1920 JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES reflected on the Britain he knew before the outbreak of the first world war. “The inhabitant of London”, he wrote, “could order by telephone, sipping his morning tea in bed, the various products of the whole earth.” Keynes’s Londoner “regarded this state of affairs as normal, certain and permanent”, and not long ago the globalisation of the present age seemed a similarly inexorable force. A new world war remains unlikely, but the uncomfortable echoes of the past in recent history suggest that a closer look at the rise and retreat of 19th-century globalisation might yield valuable lessons.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Second-time lucky”
Finance & economics February 26th 2022
- The economic consequences of the war in Ukraine
- America’s tariff wall on Chinese imports looks increasingly like Swiss cheese
- Despite bulging debt everywhere, the IMF is struggling to be helpful
- Gold demand has surged in India
- The battle to modernise Italy's corporate governance
- With maverick policies, Turkey cannot hope to bring down prices
- The many virtues of the yen, the rich world’s cheapest currency
- How to avoid a fatal backlash against globalisation
Discover more
The great-man theory of Wall Street
Why finance is still dominated by bold individuals
Hong Kong’s property slump may be terminal
Demographics and geopolitics will make a recovery harder
Why everyone wants to lend to weak companies
An unanticipated side-effect of Donald Trump’s election victory
American veterans now receive absurdly generous benefits
An enormous rise in disability payments may complicate debt-reduction efforts
Why Black Friday sales grow more annoying every year
Nobody is to blame. Everyone suffers
Trump wastes no time in reigniting trade wars
Canada and Mexico look likely to suffer