Lessons from the endowment model
There is more to it than buying alternatives and being contrarian
IN THE WEEKS following the stockmarket crash in October 1987, the investment committee of Yale University’s endowment fund convened two extraordinary meetings. Just after the crash its newish chief investment officer, David Swensen, had bought up stocks (which had become much cheaper) paid for by sales of bonds. Though in line with the fund’s agreed policy, this rebalancing appeared rash in the context of the market gloom—hence the meetings. One committee member said there would be “hell to pay” if Yale got it wrong. But the original decision stood. And it paid off handsomely.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Gifts that keep giving”
Finance & economics October 3rd 2020
- Why, despite the coronavirus pandemic, house prices continue to rise
- Is China’s biggest property developer truly too big to fail?
- Mastercard and Visa seek to get the most out of the digital-payments boom
- JPMorgan Chase faces a fine of $920m for market manipulation
- Why east and west German women still work vastly different hours
- Foreign capital helps ease India’s credit drought
- Lessons from the endowment model
- Outright bans can sometimes be a good way to fight climate change
More from Finance & economics
China meets its official growth target. Not everyone is convinced
For one thing, 2024 saw the second-weakest rise in nominal GDP since the 1970s
Ethiopia gets a stockmarket. Now it just needs some firms to list
The country is no longer the most populous without a bourse
Are big cities overrated?
New economic research suggests so
Why catastrophe bonds are failing to cover disaster damage
The innovative form of insurance is reaching its limits
“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson
It is a finite, sequential, incomplete information game
Will Donald Trump unleash Wall Street?
Bankers have plenty of reason to be hopeful