Filling a gap
One reason why China uses capital inefficiently is that it lacks reinsurance
THE magic of portfolio theory applies wherever there is risk—whether in the stockmarket or in the “market” for floods, earthquakes and so on. In simple terms, it amounts to this: risk gets cheaper when mixed with other, uncorrelated risks. Say that a dollar of capital must be set aside as a safeguard against one unit of fire risk. In a portfolio of 100 units that are far enough apart not to be burnt by the same fire, each unit might require only 90 cents; in one of 1,000 risks, 70 cents, and so on. The larger the portfolio, the more capital is freed up.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Filling a gap”
More from Finance & economics
China meets its official growth target. Not everyone is convinced
For one thing, 2024 saw the second-weakest rise in nominal GDP since the 1970s
Ethiopia gets a stockmarket. Now it just needs some firms to list
The country is no longer the most populous without a bourse
Are big cities overrated?
New economic research suggests so
Why catastrophe bonds are failing to cover disaster damage
The innovative form of insurance is reaching its limits
“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson
It is a finite, sequential, incomplete information game
Will Donald Trump unleash Wall Street?
Bankers have plenty of reason to be hopeful