Barriers to entry
Takeover practices across Europe are in need of greater clarity and transparency. The markets may be better than the EU at providing them
“WILL greed triumph?” wondered Germany's mass-market Bild Zeitung. “Takeover? Was ist das?” retorted Britain's Daily Telegraph. The hostile takeover bid by Britain's Vodafone AirTouch, a mobile-telephone company, for its partner, Mannesmann, has highlighted the gulf between German and British takeover practice, and, more generally, between British and continental capitalism. For years, the European Commission has been trying to impose some British discipline on the rest of Europe through an agreement on a takeover directive, which would set an EU-wide code for corporate mergers and acquisitions. Hopes of a breakthrough at this month's Helsinki summit were dashed. Spain refused to withdraw its objection to the directive because of its disagreement with Britain about the status of Gibraltar. The upshot: harmonisation of Europe's takeover practices seems to be as far away as ever.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Barriers to entry”
More from Finance & economics
China meets its official growth target. Not everyone is convinced
For one thing, 2024 saw the second-weakest rise in nominal GDP since the 1970s
Ethiopia gets a stockmarket. Now it just needs some firms to list
The country is no longer the most populous without a bourse
Are big cities overrated?
New economic research suggests so
Why catastrophe bonds are failing to cover disaster damage
The innovative form of insurance is reaching its limits
“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson
It is a finite, sequential, incomplete information game
Will Donald Trump unleash Wall Street?
Bankers have plenty of reason to be hopeful