Some words have two opposite meanings. Why?
This column comprises the answers—or is it the other way round?
Fans of ancient history may have thrilled to the news in the New York Times that a mystery was solved: “A Long-Lost Branch of the Nile Helped in Building Egypt’s Pyramids.” A new study, the subheading said, “confirms a long-held theory that builders used the river to transport the heavy blocks that comprise the ancient wonders.” But usage grumps may have scowled. Indeed, the line was soon changed: in the revised version, the wise old theory was “that builders used the river to transport the heavy blocks that make up the ancient wonders.”
This article appeared in the Culture section of the print edition under the headline “Comprise and compromise”
Culture September 10th 2022
- Bradford DeLong reconsiders the 20th century’s economic history
- A hit Brazilian telenovela is updated for a different age
- Ian McEwan’s new novel is the story of a single life
- Lucy Worsley takes on the mystery of Agatha Christie
- In war, the key tussles are often between generals and leaders
- Some words have two opposite meanings. Why?
Discover more
Angela Merkel sets out to restore her reputation
But her new memoir is unlikely to change her critics’ minds
The best books of 2024, as chosen by The Economist
Readers will never think the same way again about games, horses and spies
What to read to understand Elon Musk
The world’s richest man was shaped by science fiction
Tech and religion are very much alike
They both have gods, rich institutions and secretive cultures
Woodrow Wilson’s reputation continues to decline
A dispassionate new biography chronicles the former president’s hostility to suffrage
The cult of Jordan Peterson
What the Canadian intellectual gets right about young men