Overturning abortion rights ignores freedoms awarded after slavery’s end, says Peggy Cooper Davis
The law professor argues that constitutional amendments after the civil war enshrined bodily and family autonomy
THIS MONTH, America’s Supreme Court is widely expected to reverse Roe v Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision holding that women have a constitutional right to terminate an early pregnancy. A leaked draft of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Dobbs v Jackson, a case in which Roe is directly challenged, has generated understandable concern over the human and social effects of such a ruling. The consequences of losing the ability to interrupt an unwanted pregnancy are profound, and the consequences of being born outside the embrace of family can be equally so.
This article appeared in the By Invitation section of the print edition under the headline “Overturning abortion rights ignores freedoms awarded after slavery’s end, says Peggy Cooper Davis”
More from By Invitation
Trumpism is becoming more pragmatic, argues Reihan Salam
But not all of the incoming president’s backers buy it
Time is not on Russia’s side, argues Finland’s foreign minister
Elina Valtonen calls for a lower oil-price cap and tougher measures against Russia’s shadow fleet
Oriana Skylar Mastro makes a case for paring America’s nukes
The political scientist explains why beefing up is bad China strategy
A new Iranian approach to regional security and prosperity, by M. Javad Zarif
Iran’s vice-president on how his country can make the region more secure and prosperous
America’s debt cannot keep stacking up, says Jeffrey Gundlach
The “King of Bonds” sees the risk of a debt restructuring with global repercussions
South Korea’s crisis highlights both fragility and resilience, writes Wi Sung-lac
The country is deeply polarised, but its living memory of military rule strengthens its commitment to democracy