Letters
SIR – Ian Castles (Letters, May 26th) says that world income distribution has become more equal over the past 25 years. My article (“Winners and losers”, April 28th) shows why one cannot make such an unqualified statement. Of the many plausible measures, Mr Castles's statement rests on the one most favourable to the view that inequality is falling. In particular, he uses PPP exchange rates, which introduce a very substantial downward bias. If we are interested in distribution from the point of view of issues such as migration, the marginalisation of developing countries and capacity to repay foreign debts, we should compare incomes with market exchange rates. The conclusion is then unambiguous: distribution became much more unequal over the past quarter-century.
This article appeared in the By Invitation section of the print edition under the headline “Letters”
By Invitation June 2nd 2001
From the June 2nd 2001 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionMore from By Invitation
Trumpism is becoming more pragmatic, argues Reihan Salam
But not all of the incoming president’s backers buy it
Time is not on Russia’s side, argues Finland’s foreign minister
Elina Valtonen calls for a lower oil-price cap and tougher measures against Russia’s shadow fleet
Oriana Skylar Mastro makes a case for paring America’s nukes
The political scientist explains why beefing up is bad China strategy
A new Iranian approach to regional security and prosperity, by M. Javad Zarif
Iran’s vice-president on how his country can make the region more secure and prosperous
America’s debt cannot keep stacking up, says Jeffrey Gundlach
The “King of Bonds” sees the risk of a debt restructuring with global repercussions
South Korea’s crisis highlights both fragility and resilience, writes Wi Sung-lac
The country is deeply polarised, but its living memory of military rule strengthens its commitment to democracy