Inside OpenAI’s weird governance structure
Why investors had no say in Sam Altman’s sacking
“WHICH WOULD you have more confidence in? Getting your technology from a non-profit, or a for-profit company that is entirely controlled by one human being?” asked Brad Smith, president of Microsoft, at a conference in Paris on November 10th. That was Mr Smith’s way of praising OpenAI, the startup behind ChatGPT, and knocking companies like Meta, Mark Zuckerberg’s social-media giant. Events of the past week, which began on November 17th with OpenAI’s board firing its boss, Sam Altman, and ended four days later with his return to the startup he co-founded, have made the non-profit setups look rather less attractive. They have also thrown a spotlight on AI darlings’ unusual governance arrangements.
This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline “Non-profit motives”
Business November 25th 2023
- With Sam Altman’s return, a shift in AI from idealism to pragmatism
- Inside OpenAI’s weird governance structure
- ReelShort is the latest Chinese export to conquer America
- Why Chinese companies are flocking to Mexico
- Riyadh Air is betting on a tourist surge to Saudi Arabia
- How not to motivate your employees
- Every country wants its own investment-screening regime
- The many contradictions of Sam Altman
Discover more
Could seaweed replace plastic packaging?
Companies are experimenting with new ways to reduce plastic waste
Has Sequoia Capital outgrown its business model?
Venture capital’s hardiest perennial gets back to its roots
On stupid rules and quick wins
Why every boss can benefit from asking employees what most infuriates them
TikTok wants Western consumers to shop like the Chinese
It still has some convincing to do
Will the trouble ever end for Volkswagen and its rivals?
From strikes to Trump tariffs, calamities abound
After Northvolt’s failure, who will make Europe’s EV batteries?
The continent looks ever more reliant on Asian producers