What is stakeholder capitalism?
Beware a new world of near-impossible trade-offs
“WHEN DID Walmart grow a conscience?” The question, asked approvingly in a Boston Globe headline last year, would have made Milton Friedman turn in his grave. In a landmark New York Times Magazine essay, whose 50th anniversary fell on September 13th, the Nobel-prizewinning economist sought from the first paragraph to tear to shreds any notion that businesses should have social responsibilities. Employment? Discrimination? Pollution? Mere “catchwords”, he declared. Only businessmen could have responsibilities. And their sole one as managers, as he saw it, was to a firm’s owners, whose desires “generally will be to make as much money as possible while conforming to the basic rules of the society”. It is hard to find a punchier opening set of paragraphs anywhere in the annals of business.
This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline “The perils of stakeholderism”
Business September 19th 2020
- Who will rule the Teslaverse?
- Can Nikola become the next Tesla?
- How BP’s newish boss sees the future of fossil fuels
- How Nvidia’s purchase of Arm could open new markets
- Who are the TikTok saga’s biggest winners?
- How do you stop corporate fraud?
- How Snowflake raised $3bn in a record software IPO
- What is stakeholder capitalism?
More from Business
Germans are world champions of calling in sick
It’s easy and it pays well
Knowing what your colleagues earn
The pros and cons of greater pay transparency
A $500bn investment plan says a lot about Trump’s AI priorities
It’s build, baby, build
Donald Trump’s America will not become a tech oligarchy
Reasons not to panic about the tech-industrial complex
OpenAI’s latest model will change the economics of software
The more reasoning it does, the more computer power it uses
Donald Trump once tried to ban TikTok. Now can he save it?
To keep the app alive in America, he must persuade China to sell up