Worth the wait, but not in gold
Ten years ago came an astounding first novel. How does the second compare?
EVEN before it was published, with a whopping initial print run of 300,000 in America alone, Donna Tartt's new novel was talked of as a “To Kill a Mockingbird” for our times. That a publisher should be so lucky. Harper Lee's slim Pulitzer-prize winning novel about racial injustice was picked up by three American book clubs almost as soon as it came out in the summer of 1960. Although the story was set in the 1930s, the gathering civil-rights storm gave it a critical contemporary resonance. In its first year, “To Kill a Mockingbird” sold 2.5m copies. By the time its second anniversary rolled around, it had been on the American bestseller lists for 100 weeks.
This article appeared in the Culture section of the print edition under the headline “Worth the wait, but not in gold”
Discover more
Germany’s former chancellor sets out to restore her reputation
But her new memoir is unlikely to change her critics’ minds
The best books of 2024, as chosen by The Economist
Readers will never think the same way again about games, horses and spies
What to read to understand Elon Musk
The world’s richest man was shaped by science fiction
Tech and religion are very much alike
They both have gods, rich institutions and secretive cultures
Woodrow Wilson’s reputation continues to decline
A dispassionate new biography chronicles the former president’s hostility to suffrage
The cult of Jordan Peterson
What the Canadian intellectual gets right about young men