How not to administer justice after a brutal civil war
Post-war reconciliation in Nepal is a nice idea. Too bad about the politics
It has been 20 years since Sushila Chaudhary’s sister was abducted from her village by Nepal’s army, never to return. It has been 18 years since soldiers came to her brother’s house, locked him in a room, and tortured and killed him. Ms Chaudhary, now a lawyer in her mid-30s, has spent the better part of two decades trying to find out who killed her brother and what happened to her sister. Like many others who lost family members during Nepal’s civil war from 1996 to 2006, or who themselves suffered abuse, she has been frustrated by the authorities. “I am sure there are records of who is responsible,” she says. “But they have never given them to us.”
This article appeared in the Asia section of the print edition under the headline “Lost in transition”
Asia August 13th 2022
- The nuclear arsenals of China, India and Pakistan are growing
- South Korea’s president is tightening his grip on the police
- Australia’s leader wants to include Aboriginals in the constitution
- Papua New Guinea conducts its worst election ever
- How not to administer justice after a brutal civil war
- Afghanistan is poorer and hungrier than a year ago
More from Asia
Who is Lee Jae-myung, South Korea’s possible next president?
The Economist interviews the divisive progressive leader
Is Cambodia slipping out of China’s orbit?
A new generation of leaders could be more receptive to the West
Why Taiwanese youth complain of becoming “housing slaves”
A new generation is questioning the value of homeownership
The Quad finally gets serious on security
The Indo-Pacific coalition signals a tougher approach to China
Taiwan’s political drama is paralysing its government
Domestic dysfunction plays right into China’s hands
An angry culture war surrounds Australia Day
Conservatives claim that wokeness is destroying the national holiday