When sex is unfair
A new ruling to spice up office politics
CALIFORNIAN employers beware. The state Supreme Court has just ruled that an unwelcome sexual advance is not the only evidence that a worker has suffered sexual harassment. So, too, is favouritism shown to a fellow-worker because she (or he) is sleeping with the boss.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “When sex is unfair”
From the July 23rd 2005 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents
Explore the editionDiscover more
Donald Trump may find it harder to dominate America’s conversation
A more fragmented media is tougher to manage
An FBI sting operation catches Jackson’s mayor taking big bribes
What the sensational undoing of the black leader means for Mississippi’s failing capital
America’s rural-urban divide nurtures wannabe state-splitters
What’s behind a new wave of secessionism
Does Donald Trump have unlimited authority to impose tariffs?
Yes, but other factors could hold him back
As Jack Smith exits, Donald Trump’s allies hint at retribution
The president-elect hopes to hand the Justice Department to loyalists
Democratic states are preparing for Donald Trump’s return
But Mr Trump will be more prepared, too