The Economist explains

Is Elon Musk’s $1m giveaway to American voters illegal?

His lottery scheme raises thorny questions—and sets a new precedent

SpaceX and Tesla founder Elon Musk participates in a town hall-style meeting to promote early and absentee voting at Ridley High School in Folsom, Pennsylvania, USA.
Photograph: Getty Images

EASY MONEY is usually too good to be true. Elon Musk, a billionaire, is promising it nonetheless. The tech mogul is offering to pay registered voters in American swing states at least $47 if they sign a petition pledging their “support” for freedom of speech and the right to bear arms (both of which are protected by the constitution). On October 19th he announced that signees would also be entered into a daily prize draw to win $1m. This will run until election day, November 5th. The contest is operated by “America”, Mr Musk’s pro-Trump super PAC, into which he has poured around $75m. “It’s innovative and it’s desperate,” scoffed Mark Cuban, a fellow billionaire. Josh Shapiro, Pennsylvania’s Democratic governor, called it “deeply concerning” and said it was “something that law enforcement could take a look at”. Has Mr Musk’s lottery crossed a legal line?

Explore more

Discover more

Close-up of chrysotile asbestos fibers on a gloved hand.

Is RFK junior right to say America allows more toxins than the EU?

He is, but things are slowly beginning to change

A photo illustration showing a pile of coal gradually disappearing.

What would it cost to kill coal?

The price of shutting down coal power, and what would be gained


A bumper sticker on an SUV reads 'FLUORIDE - THERE IS POISON IN THE TAP WATER' in Blackhawk, Colorado, USA.

Should America ban fluoride in its drinking water?

The idea by Robert F. Kennedy junior—nominated by Donald Trump as health secretary—may have teeth


Why is Donald Trump keen to use “recess appointments”?

The president-elect is testing the loyalty of the Senate’s next majority leader

Will Donald Trump’s power be unchecked if Republicans win the House?

A “trifecta” of presidency, Senate and House of Representatives would provide a huge opportunity

Why The Economist endorses political candidates

Our independence is protected by our principles and structure