A flood of fiascos
THE Sardar Sarovar dam on the Narmada river, in India, is a stark example of how the World Bank's conditions on resettlement and environmental damage—which were attached to its loan in 1985—could fail. An independent report found that, among other things, the benefits were over-estimated, environmental impact assessments were not done and resettlement conditions were not met. The Bank's own India department altered a study criticising the resettlement, to hide the problems from the Bank's directors. The loan was cancelled in 1993 and India's Supreme Court suspended construction in 1995. The angry protests against Sardar Sarovar became a model for others and focused attention on how bad dams could be.
Discover more
Elon Musk is causing problems for the Royal Society
His continued membership has led to a high-profile resignation
Deforestation is costing Brazilian farmers millions
Without trees to circulate moisture, the land is getting hotter and drier
Robots can learn new actions faster thanks to AI techniques
They could soon show their moves in settings from car factories to care homes
Scientists are learning why ultra-processed foods are bad for you
A mystery is finally being solved
Scientific publishers are producing more papers than ever
Concerns about some of their business models are building
The two types of human laugh
One is caused by tickling; the other by everything else