Eye to eye?
FOR the third time this century, Europe is labouring over a peace settlement that will shape its destiny for a generation. It could be third time lucky, if next week's summit between Bill Clinton and Boris Yeltsin helps the West and Russia to clinch a new grand bargain before July, when NATO starts opening its doors to the first new members from Central Europe. Unlike Germany in 1918, Russia is being offered a genuine security partnership, not a peace imposed by victor on vanquished; unlike 1945, 1997 provides no great ideological schism to undermine the peacebuilding. Six years after the Soviet Union collapsed, America, Western Europe and a democratising Russia have a chance to build lasting stability in this much fought-over continent. But unless the deal can be got right--with NATO offering Russia neither too little nor too much--the chance could be lost.
Discover more
Lessons from the failure of Northvolt
Governments blew billions on a battery champion. Time to welcome foreign investors instead
How to make a success of peace talks with Vladimir Putin
The key is robust security guarantees for Ukrainians
Javier Milei: “My contempt for the state is infinite”
Argentina’s president is idolised by the Trumpian right. They should get to know him better
Tariff threats will do harm, even if Donald Trump does not impose them
The risk of a trade war is uncomfortably high
Peace in Lebanon is just a start
Donald Trump must build on Joe Biden’s belated success
From Nixon to China, to Trump to Tehran
Iran is weak. For America’s next president that creates an opportunity