Why long-term economic growth often disappoints
A new paper suggests technological progress is overrated
FROM THE point of view of the 1950s, America’s economic progress over the 70 years that followed has been a huge disappointment. Futurists foresaw a world of super-pills, space farms and cities encased in glass. Science and technology would engineer unending riches and everything consumers could ever want. Yet the speed of gains achieved during the Space Age, it turned out, soon ebbed: between 2000 and 2019 America’s real income per head grew by 1.2% a year on average, down from 2% between 1980 and 1999 and 2.5% in the 1950s. And instead of flying cars, Peter Thiel, a venture capitalist, once jibed, “we got 140 characters”.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Growing Solow”
Finance & economics May 7th 2022
- The Fed’s balance-sheet is about to shrink. Wall Street is not ready
- China’s erratic policies are terrifying investors
- India begins the privatisation of its huge life-insurance company
- Russia’s economy is back on its feet
- Watchdogs take a swipe at Apple Pay
- Will an ever feebler currency save or sink Japan’s economy?
- Desperate Lebanese depositors are taking their banks to court
- Who wins from carnage in the credit markets?
More from Finance & economics
China meets its official growth target. Not everyone is convinced
For one thing, 2024 saw the second-weakest rise in nominal GDP since the 1970s
Ethiopia gets a stockmarket. Now it just needs some firms to list
The country is no longer the most populous without a bourse
Are big cities overrated?
New economic research suggests so
Why catastrophe bonds are failing to cover disaster damage
The innovative form of insurance is reaching its limits
“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson
It is a finite, sequential, incomplete information game
Will Donald Trump unleash Wall Street?
Bankers have plenty of reason to be hopeful