Contumacious fetishism
A year after a market crash, regulators are still looking for a villain
DESPITE a hunger for foreign capital, in India, as in many countries, there lingers a deep suspicion of foreign capitalists. So when the stockmarket index tumbled by as much as 17% in a single day—May 17th 2004—an investigation was launched into alleged murky dealings by a dozen foreign firms. A year later, the regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), has imposed its first sanctions. UBS Securities, the local arm of a Swiss financial giant, has been banned for a year from issuing offshore derivatives based on Indian shares. This week, there were reports that this may not be its only punishment. The central bank, the Reserve Bank, was said to be dragging its feet on approving UBS's application for a banking licence.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Contumacious fetishism”
Discover more
The great-man theory of Wall Street
Why finance is still dominated by bold individuals
Hong Kong’s property slump may be terminal
Demographics and geopolitics will make a recovery harder
Why everyone wants to lend to weak companies
An unanticipated side-effect of Donald Trump’s election victory
American veterans now receive absurdly generous benefits
An enormous rise in disability payments may complicate debt-reduction efforts
Why Black Friday sales grow more annoying every year
Nobody is to blame. Everyone suffers
Trump wastes no time in reigniting trade wars
Canada and Mexico look likely to suffer