A tax to keep cool
In 1989, The Economist argued that the only way for governments to stop global warming is to put a price on pollution, preferably with a carbon tax
HERE is a hunch. Within the next half-century the governments of many industrial countries will raise perhaps one-fifth of their revenues from taxes and charges on pollution. Largest of all will be a tax on the carbon dioxide emitted when fossil fuels—coal, gas and oil—are burnt. The effect of this tax may be roughly to double the price of high-carbon fuels. Why should this happen? Because the alternative will be further concentration of carbon in the earth's atmosphere, with unpredictable but almost certainly nasty effects.
More from Finance & economics
China meets its official growth target. Not everyone is convinced
For one thing, 2024 saw the second-weakest rise in nominal GDP since the 1970s
Ethiopia gets a stockmarket. Now it just needs some firms to list
The country is no longer the most populous without a bourse
Are big cities overrated?
New economic research suggests so
Why catastrophe bonds are failing to cover disaster damage
The innovative form of insurance is reaching its limits
“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson
It is a finite, sequential, incomplete information game
Will Donald Trump unleash Wall Street?
Bankers have plenty of reason to be hopeful